Respect Indian ingenuity

 The wheel has turned full circle. Once India’s premier telecom R&D outfit, the Centre for Development of Telematics (C-DoT), has tied up with the French telecom outfit Alcatel to develop “broadband wireless access systems”. The new venture, to be a “global research and development centre” is likely be christened AlcaDoT. The whole exercise is ironical, in more ways than one. C-DoT, when it came up in the late ’80s, was conceived with the aim of taking on the MNCs, who were the sole suppliers of telephone exchanges to India then. These MNCs often milked India as there was no local substitute and they could charge what they felt like. C-DoT changed all that. As Sam Pitroda utilised his friendship with Rajiv Gandhi to ensure political patronage, and coupled that with the redoubtable telecom mind of G B Meemamsi, things began to take shape, which shook the MNCs. Alcatel, which was the main supplier of telephone exchanges to India, and had a tie-up with ITI for producing switches, felt the most threatened. One remembers the shenanigans of these MNCs, who felt they might lose their toehold in what had the potential to be a huge market, and the subsequent setting up of a committee under K P P Nambiar. The committee, instead of lauding C-DoT for what it had achieved for the nation in terms of rural exchange and other developments, chose to damn it for sins it never committed. There was little doubt at whose behest these moves, designed to scuttle C-DoT’s meteoric rise, were made. However, despite that, C-DoT delivered. India has around five million fixed telephone lines currently. C-DoT accounts for perhaps 30-35% of these. The real impact, however, is far greater. The ubiquitous STD/ISD booths dotting our rural landscape as also the NHs are the gift of C-DoT’s rural automatic exchange. If telecom connectivity is the engine of an economy, C-DoT made that possible. Add to that the bargaining chip that it provided resulting in the cost per line plummeting from over Rs 9,000 per line to under Rs 2,500 now. Sure, there are other reasons for this drop in prices such as competition, lowering cost of technology and others, but the initial push was undoubtedly provided by the fact that we could always say, “else we have C-DoT.” But what did it get in return? Step-motherly treatment from successive ministers, who thought of it as no more than a small ego massager to be used to satisfy their whims. One wanted it to be used for developing mobile switches, and the present one now wants to do something as long as it is done in his home state. One look at the initial clauses that the JV was supposed to work under and the casual approach becomes clear. A close look almost shows that some clauses were anti-national. One such clause stated that the shareholders would not compete with the business of the JV company. Nothing wrong with that, except that C-DoT affiliates were defined in a manner that it included R&D initiatives of Isro and DRDO as well. The hawk eyes of a couple of governing council members caught this and it has apparently been confined now to telecom R&D institutions under the communications ministry.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How about inter-connect exchanges?

 In the late ’80s, when Sam Pitroda controlled the reins of Indian telecom, there was constant talk of a new telecom policy. But once V P Singh came to power in early ’90s, Sam fell out of favour and the nation blundered along without a cogent policy. A few years down the line, the irrepressible N Vittal assumed charge of the Telecom Commission, becoming the first IAS officer to assume that role, and kept assuring all that the policy’d be out any day now, till one day, out of sheer exasperation, he told me, “I think I will just say that the new policy is coming on this day, this month, and not add the year to it”. We have come a long way since then. From a tele-density of under 1, it is now nudging 10, and mobiles have outstripped landlines in number. And sure enough, since the exciting Vittal quote, we are now readying the third policy document, whose draft has been around for a while. Like all documents, this one too is being analysed threadbare by intere...
Read more

War over spectrum allocation

 upset with the way the department of telecommunications has allocated spectrum for mobile operators. In a missive to the Telecom Commission chairman, and then to the prime minister, he has ripped through the department’s move to link spectrum allocation with technology and subscriber base. Gauging the seriousness of Tata’s allegations, and the fact that it has the potential to derail their ambitions, the GSM operators too have gone into an overdrive, with their association and the individual operators all sending rejoinders to whoever cares to listen. A spectrum war has begun. As the subscriber base has grown, the operators have been unable to meet the service quality, so they claim, due to the inadequate spectrum. However, since most of the spectrum in this country is held by defence forces, it is impossible for the government to make it available to operators at one go, as is done internationally. So the government allots additional spectrum “based on a...
Read more

The illusion of spectrum scarcity

 Come what come may, penned the Bard, Time and the hour runs through the roughest day. Actually, time brings all things to pass! Everything is a matter of chronology, really. Consider, for instance, the radio frequency spectrum for mobile telephony. In particular, the issue of extra bandwidth for the next — the third—generation (3G) mobile services. With the passage of time and technological change, the notion of routinely licensing chunks of spectrum for service providers is now being vigorously questioned, the world over. Very unlike in the analogue era, today’s digital technologies do allow for new approaches to freeing up and managing spectrum. As much as 99% of even highly saturated bands may be vacant in any specific moment in time and space, innovative software can dynamically shift signals to make full use of the fleeting openings in the wireless “ether”(“white spaces”). The point is, new technologies do allow for much flexibility in spectrum usage. The ...
Read more