It’s mind vs mindset in India

 A recent visitor to Shanghai came back impressed with the spanking new glass and steel visage of modernity. He also noticed the extent of computerisation and how IT was being used to improve efficiencies in the day to day functioning. Being a regular visitor to the country, he also noticed that most of the IT solutions continued to be in the local language, although English was creeping up too. The attempt is not to compare the IT industries of India and China, for such a comparison is hardly flattering. Except in software exports, where we have a reputation, in the rest of the areas that comprise IT – hardware, domestic software, telecommunications infrastructure, among others, we are pygmies. I am merely trying to re-emphasise the importance of using IT to improve efficiencies on the domestic front. IT is the most efficient tool to improve efficiencies, be it governance or corporate management. A report by the Centre for Media Studies, for example, had shown through statistics that computerisation in various government departments, wherever it happened, had led to a substantial decline in corruption levels. For functions such as land record, electricity, municipal corporations, urban development, transport, civil supplies, hospitals, water supply and railways, to name a few, where it is possible to virtually avoid human interface if computers can take over, it would make life so much simpler for the common man. Not only would it save him from the clutches of the corrupt, but it would improve the speed of delivery too. But how does one achieve this? It certainly cannot be done when a country of over a billion people adds no more than 3 million computers in a year. It cannot be done if the sole emphasis of policy makers remains software exports. And most importantly, it is virtually impossible if in a country as diverse as ours with multiple languages, the only language in which computers work is English! Not that the government is not aware of this. Tomes have been prepared by ministries ranging from HRD to IT, about writing software in Indian languages. Seminars and workshops have been conducted to discuss the issue. However, since it is not as sexy as exports, nor do dollars come tumbling in, it remains no more than lip service. The big daddies of the IT industry too are never seen espousing the cause of software in local languages. Their reasons could be commercial, after all they are responsible to their shareholders and must look after their company’s bottom line. But this is where the government’s push is required. As long as the emphasis is on English language, as it currently is, our sole concern is exports, not domestic use. To put it rather crudely, all that some of our brightest are doing so far is to make the Americans, and others, work more efficiently. The skills that are talked about with envy the world over have made not an iota of difference to the lives of people in India.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How about inter-connect exchanges?

 In the late ’80s, when Sam Pitroda controlled the reins of Indian telecom, there was constant talk of a new telecom policy. But once V P Singh came to power in early ’90s, Sam fell out of favour and the nation blundered along without a cogent policy. A few years down the line, the irrepressible N Vittal assumed charge of the Telecom Commission, becoming the first IAS officer to assume that role, and kept assuring all that the policy’d be out any day now, till one day, out of sheer exasperation, he told me, “I think I will just say that the new policy is coming on this day, this month, and not add the year to it”. We have come a long way since then. From a tele-density of under 1, it is now nudging 10, and mobiles have outstripped landlines in number. And sure enough, since the exciting Vittal quote, we are now readying the third policy document, whose draft has been around for a while. Like all documents, this one too is being analysed threadbare by intere...
Read more

War over spectrum allocation

 upset with the way the department of telecommunications has allocated spectrum for mobile operators. In a missive to the Telecom Commission chairman, and then to the prime minister, he has ripped through the department’s move to link spectrum allocation with technology and subscriber base. Gauging the seriousness of Tata’s allegations, and the fact that it has the potential to derail their ambitions, the GSM operators too have gone into an overdrive, with their association and the individual operators all sending rejoinders to whoever cares to listen. A spectrum war has begun. As the subscriber base has grown, the operators have been unable to meet the service quality, so they claim, due to the inadequate spectrum. However, since most of the spectrum in this country is held by defence forces, it is impossible for the government to make it available to operators at one go, as is done internationally. So the government allots additional spectrum “based on a...
Read more

The illusion of spectrum scarcity

 Come what come may, penned the Bard, Time and the hour runs through the roughest day. Actually, time brings all things to pass! Everything is a matter of chronology, really. Consider, for instance, the radio frequency spectrum for mobile telephony. In particular, the issue of extra bandwidth for the next — the third—generation (3G) mobile services. With the passage of time and technological change, the notion of routinely licensing chunks of spectrum for service providers is now being vigorously questioned, the world over. Very unlike in the analogue era, today’s digital technologies do allow for new approaches to freeing up and managing spectrum. As much as 99% of even highly saturated bands may be vacant in any specific moment in time and space, innovative software can dynamically shift signals to make full use of the fleeting openings in the wireless “ether”(“white spaces”). The point is, new technologies do allow for much flexibility in spectrum usage. The ...
Read more