Taking a leaf about country's techbook

Soaking in the results of the scorching growth pace the Dragon has set! When queried about why India cannot do what its northern neighbour can, he lamented the various issues which hammer (and sickle!) our growth initiatives. However, a World Bank official put things in perspective saying the problem with India was not too much democracy, but bureaucracy, adding “if authoritarian rule was the answer to economic growth, then North Korea would be manna and South Korea would be in the doldrums.” The Bank official hit the nail on the head, but only partially. One only needs to look around to see how China goes about building itself and compare it with what we do. Since telecommunications is the big story in both countries, a close look at the sector itself would provide more than just clues. Nokia, the Finnish GSM giant, is starting a new JV with China’s Putian Communications to develop technology for Chinese 3G mobile standard known as TD-SCDMA. The company, according to reports, would invest $111 million and hold 49% stake in the venture. This follows a similar announcement by Germany’s Siemens AG last year which committed over $100 million for a similar development with Huawei Technologies. Other big daddies of the mobile world, Motorola and Ericsson, too have made commitments to support the Chinese standard. It is no secret that China has been actively pushing for its own standard in 3G to not only foster development of its own telecom sector, but more importantly, to avoid the huge royalties they would be required to pay to the existing manufacturers. It is quite possible that China would eventually go with the uniform world standard, but this posturing would get it concessions which we in India can only dream of. An instance of this is already visible in the GSM market. Currently there are four European (Ericsson, Nokia, Alcatel and Siemens), two American (Motorola and Nortel) and four Chinese (Huawei, ZTE, Datang and Putian) companies making GSM infrastructure. Wonder why, if the Indian market is among the most sought after market in the world, there aren’t any Indian manufacturer in the picture? The answer is simple. The Chinese seem to be governed by national interests alone. A high ranking official from a leading American telecom consultancy told me that the Chinese cleverly played their market card with the monopolistic European and American manufacturers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How about inter-connect exchanges?

 In the late ’80s, when Sam Pitroda controlled the reins of Indian telecom, there was constant talk of a new telecom policy. But once V P Singh came to power in early ’90s, Sam fell out of favour and the nation blundered along without a cogent policy. A few years down the line, the irrepressible N Vittal assumed charge of the Telecom Commission, becoming the first IAS officer to assume that role, and kept assuring all that the policy’d be out any day now, till one day, out of sheer exasperation, he told me, “I think I will just say that the new policy is coming on this day, this month, and not add the year to it”. We have come a long way since then. From a tele-density of under 1, it is now nudging 10, and mobiles have outstripped landlines in number. And sure enough, since the exciting Vittal quote, we are now readying the third policy document, whose draft has been around for a while. Like all documents, this one too is being analysed threadbare by intere...
Read more

War over spectrum allocation

 upset with the way the department of telecommunications has allocated spectrum for mobile operators. In a missive to the Telecom Commission chairman, and then to the prime minister, he has ripped through the department’s move to link spectrum allocation with technology and subscriber base. Gauging the seriousness of Tata’s allegations, and the fact that it has the potential to derail their ambitions, the GSM operators too have gone into an overdrive, with their association and the individual operators all sending rejoinders to whoever cares to listen. A spectrum war has begun. As the subscriber base has grown, the operators have been unable to meet the service quality, so they claim, due to the inadequate spectrum. However, since most of the spectrum in this country is held by defence forces, it is impossible for the government to make it available to operators at one go, as is done internationally. So the government allots additional spectrum “based on a...
Read more

The illusion of spectrum scarcity

 Come what come may, penned the Bard, Time and the hour runs through the roughest day. Actually, time brings all things to pass! Everything is a matter of chronology, really. Consider, for instance, the radio frequency spectrum for mobile telephony. In particular, the issue of extra bandwidth for the next — the third—generation (3G) mobile services. With the passage of time and technological change, the notion of routinely licensing chunks of spectrum for service providers is now being vigorously questioned, the world over. Very unlike in the analogue era, today’s digital technologies do allow for new approaches to freeing up and managing spectrum. As much as 99% of even highly saturated bands may be vacant in any specific moment in time and space, innovative software can dynamically shift signals to make full use of the fleeting openings in the wireless “ether”(“white spaces”). The point is, new technologies do allow for much flexibility in spectrum usage. The ...
Read more