Just a year before Berlin replaced Bonn as the German capital, I was
there for a conference. My cabbie looked around, glanced at me and
asked: Do you know the national bird of Germany? No! I said! Cranes! He
replied. Which one? I asked. The Construction cranes, he retorted. I
looked around. Sure enough, all I could see around were nothing but
construction cranes. So overwhelmingly did they dominate the skyline!
doweshowbellyad=0; Have you noticed the unmistakable
change in the Indian urban skyline of late? Just stand atop a building
in any urban part of India to know the difference. Up to seven service
providers, all vying with one another to hog the skyline with their
towers on which is mounted their transmitters to satiate the nation’s
long suppressed need for telecommunications. Also Read
RCoVL to merge 9 arms with itself FII investments in Bharti
Airtel hit a block But it is one thing to feel great about this
changing landscape, completely different if you look at the critical
attendant issues. I am referring to the health hazard. Talk about the
perils of using mobile phones has been around for years, with no
conclusive evidence really. Often a claim is made that using mobile
handsets is dangerous, and that it causes brain tumour, to be quickly
debunked by a study saying how it is harmless for humans. It’s a
different matter that these debunking theories, as claimed by some, are
always at the behest of interested mobile companies. The threat of
hazard posed by the towers, or at least its realisation, is of a more
recent origin. But a Delhi-based NGO was alarmed adequately enough to
move a PIL in the Supreme Court against their mushrooming growth and the
attendant health risks. The court too, on its part, thought the matter
was serious enough for it to seek responses from a bevy of government
ministries. India can take a lead in the issue of mobile
phones as a health hazard. What stops us from setting up a body of
experts drawn from say the All India Institute of Medical Sciences and
IISc to go into the technical-medical issues involved? Whatever
might be the truth, the fact is that there is enough data to show that
it is better to be cautious. In Australia, for example, as recently as
May this year, a spate of brain tumours among staff forced a university
to close part of its business school and test for radiation emissions
from rooftop phone towers. The university discovered with shock that
five of its employees had tested positive for brain tumour in the past
month alone, in addition to two others in 1999 and 2001. Two were
malignant and five were benign. While the university’s decision was
greeted with shock by the business school employees, electrical workers
who worked near the mobile phone towers were barred from working for
fears of links between emissions and a “caner cluster”. The mobile
industry, as expected, reacted that there was nothing to prove that the
tumours were in any way linked to emissions from the mobile towers. Fair
enough! There is nothing conclusive yet. But is it still not something
that needs to be looked into?